| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative
Cost ( Small to medium size parts ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Relative
Cost ( Medium to large size parts) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Accuracy |
|
|
|
|
|
| Functional
Prototypes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Presentation
Prototypes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fine
& Crisp Feature Detailing |
|
|
|
|
|
| Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
| Material
Selection Range |
|
|
|
|
|
| Typical
Lead time |
|
|
|
|
|
| Parts
with snap fit features |
|
|
|
|
|
| Water,
Chemical, Heat resistance |
|
|
|
|
|
| Metal
prototypes direct from machine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Elastomer,
Flexible Rubber like parts |
|
|
|
|
|
| Master
Models for Tooling |
|
|
|
|
|
| Brief
about the following Technologies |
Good combination of strength and
surface finish at affordable price and lead time.
|
Excellent surface finish suitable for
presentation, master models and light functional testing. |
Range of materials available, soft like
rubber to strong like metal. SLS Nylon suitable for snap and
living hinge features |
Use when mechanical properties can not
be compromised with any additive RP process. |
Suitable for general purpose parts for
initial design stage with a quick delivery. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This table has been correlated to assist you in
material selection and only to be used as a reference and is
believed to be accurate. Nothing contained here shall be construed
as a recommendation to use any product or process in violation
of the claims of any patent now in effect. Arptech services
do not expressly or implicitly provide a warranty or approval
of the intended materials selection or methods of fabrication
of the prototype(s) or final part(s).
|